Ethics are moral principles and values
that govern the actions and decisions of an individual or group (Belch 731). It’s
no surprise that some commercials and/or advertisements are ethically questionable
at best. For this blog, I will explore 3 different advertisements and analyze
their lack of ideally ethical consideration.
The first
ad is Reebok’s “Cheat on your girlfriend, not on your workout” poster. This is a perfect example of advertising as offensive or in bad taste (Belch 734). It's a controversial ad which was originally intended to motivate gym goers in a German Gym. Instead, it produced a detrimental stigma for Reebok and was quickly removed from display as a result of widespread complaints. One letter sent from Cheaterville.com (a site that publicizes cheating partners) in response to this poster read: " This form of advertising shows a dishonest and disrespectful attitude towards women and your company should be ashamed to have even placed this ad in various places thinking it would be perceived in any other way" (Fleming). This goes against the moral principles to remain faithful and truthful.
The second advertisement is SalesGenie's “Pandas” promo for the 2008 SuperBowl. This commercial is a perfect example of advertising creating and perpetuating stereotypes through its portrayal of an ethnic minority (Belch 744). This advertisement consisted of two pandas, with Chinese accents and broken english, fretting about their struggling bamboo shop. Though this could have been worse when it comes to stereotyping, the fact that these panda's were clearly meant to be chinese, used broken english, and owned a small shop offended some viewers and ultimately challenged the boundaries of being ethically acceptable.
The final advertisement I am going to discuss is Sisley's "Fashion Junkie". This advertisement is a perfect example of shock advertising. Shock advertising uses startling images to get consumers' attention (Belch 736). This ad was created by Zoo advertising, Shanghai, China (StyleDash) and depicts two women "snorting" a white dress as if it is cocaine, as well as a credit card with actual cocaine spread on it. Though the effort to correlate a shopping or fashion addiction to another addiction makes sense, this was a risqué way to portray such a phenomenon. It is very discomforting to view the eyes of the model to the right who shows side effects of cocaine use and drug use is not a topic to take lightly.
References and Sources
Belch, GE. and Belch, MA. Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 9th Edition. McGraw-Hill Companies. 2012.
Fleming, O. (2012, March 22). Reebok forced to pull controversial 'Cheat On Your Girlfriend, Not Your Workout' ad campaign after public backlash. Mail Online. Retrieved April 3, 2014, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2118314/Reebok-forced-pull-controversial-Cheat-On-Your-Girlfriend-Not-Your-Workout-ad-campaign-public-backlash.html
StyleDash. (n.d.). Sisley: Fashion junkie.Marketing and Advertising Guide by Dr Prem. Retrieved April 3, 2014, from http://drprem.com/marketing/sisley-fashion-junkie.html
Top 10 Tasteless Ads. (2009, June 29).Time. Retrieved April 3, 2014, from http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1907218_1907236_1907223,00.html
Comments
Post a Comment