Skip to main content

Agency/Client Switches


            This blog is dedicated to explaining why advertising agencies lose clients and a situation in which a client switched agencies. 
First things first, advertising agencies lose clients for some of the following common reasons:

·      Poor performance or service. The client becomes dissatisfied with the quality of the advertising and/or the service provided by the agency. 
·      Poor communication between the client and agency personnel that causes an unfavorable working relationship.
·      Unrealistic demands expected from the agency by the client that reduce the account’s profitability or exceed the amount of compensation received.
·      Personality conflicts between the client and agency.
·      Personnel changes.
·      Changes in the size of the client or agency. The client may outgrow the agency or vice versa.
·      Conflicts of interest.
·      Changes in the client’s corporate and/or marketing strategy.
·      Declining sales.
·      Conflicting compensation philosophies, particularly pertaining to the level or method of compensation.
·      Changes in policies.
·      Disagreements over marketing and/or creative strategy.
·      Lack of integrated marketing capabilities.

A recent (July 2013) example of a client/agency switch is Samsung Telecommunications America switching its digital ad business from Publicis Groupe’s Razorfish to Interpublic’s RGA.  The reasons for this switch are budget cuts, a change in direction on Samsung’s digital media work to be more tactically focused, and disappointing sales of Samsung’s Galaxy S4. 
In this situation, the loser is Razorfish and the winner is RGA.  Samsung is a successful client said to be the “only serious contender to Apple in the U.S. smartphone market in terms of both perception and sales” (Bruell).  RGA is fortunate to have its work noticed by such a growing company and must have made a positive impression on Samsung through its prior work with Nike and other top corporations.  Losing business with such a strong company, such as Samsung, should disappoint Razorfish.  They should have shown better capability in focusing on tactical digital media work and properly selling the Galaxy S4.




Sources and Citations

Belch, GE. and Belch, MA.  Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 9th Edition.  McGraw-Hill Companies.  2012.

Bruell, Alexandra. "Ad Age Agency News." Advertising Age Agency News RSS. Ad Age, 10 July 2013. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://adage.com/article/agency-news/samsung-telecommunications-moves-digital-business-rga/243045/>.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advantages and Limitations of Television Advertising

As new means of entertainment are being created to bypass and/or limit the consumption of TV advertisements, the strength of using TV advertising is becoming more and more debatable. However, TV advertising still has its advantages and limitations for both major national advertisers and local companies.  The advantages to TV advertising are:  Creativity and Impact:  The interaction of sight and sound offers tremendous creative flexibility and makes possible dramatic, lifelike representations of products and services. TV commercials can be used to convey a mood or image for a brand as well as to develop emotional or entertaining appeals that help make a dull product appear interesting. (Belch 365)  Coverage and Cost Effectiveness:  Nearly everyone, regardless of age, sex, income, or educational level, watches at least some TV. "According to Nielson Media Research estimates, nearly 280 million people age 2 or older live in the nation's 114.9 million...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethically Questionable Ads

Ethics are moral principles and values that govern the actions and decisions of an individual or group (Belch 731). It’s no surprise that some commercials and/or advertisements are ethically questionable at best. For this blog, I will explore 3 different advertisements and analyze their lack of ideally ethical consideration. The first ad is Reebok’s    “Cheat on your girlfriend, not on your workout”     poster. This is a perfect example of advertising as offensive or in bad taste (Belch 734). It's a controversial ad which was originally intended to motivate gym goers in a German Gym. Instead, it produced a detrimental stigma for Reebok and was quickly removed from display as a result of widespread complaints. One letter sent from Cheaterville.com (a site that publicizes cheating partners) in response to this poster read: " This form of advertising shows a dishonest and disrespectful attitude towards women and your company should be ashamed to have even placed ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Any Publicity is Good Publicity"?

"Publicity refers to the generation of news about a person, product, or service that appears in broadcast or print media" (Belch 584).  Many say that any publicity is good publicity.  However, what about publicity that truly is not all that "good" in nature?  This comes into play specifically when it comes to people. Exhibit A: Jeff Skilling One example of bad publicity is in the case of the energy company Enron and its former president Jeff Skilling.  Enron’s bankruptcy in 2001, after allegations of substantial accounting fraud, wiped out $78 billion in stock market value.   This also led to the collapse of Arthur Andersen and the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   A class action settlement of $7.185 billion was the largest in history.   Former President/CEO Jeff Skilling is serving a 24-year sentence as a result. (Forbes) Jeff Skilling’s responsibility for Enron’s accounting fraud got huge publicity in the early to mid 2000s. ...
Post a Comment
Read more